EXPANSION OF THE INVASIVE BALKAN SLUG TANDONIA KUSCERI (STYLOMMATOPHORA: MILACIDAE): A NEW FRONTIER IN NORTHERN UKRAINE AND OTHER NEW RECORDS

a Bstract : The distribution of the invasive slug Tandonia kusceri is reviewed and mapped with our new findings and previously unpublished recent reports based on photographs from citizen science databases (iNaturalist, UkrBIN). Two new colonies of T. kusceri were found and monitored in Kyiv city (Northern Ukraine) during the 2021–2022. These colonies are about 350 km north from the nearest previously published records of this species, as well as any other species of Milacidae in Eastern Europe. The slugs inhabit the urban open and semi-open landscapes of Kyiv city together with several other invasive molluscs, in one locality notably together with Oxychilus translucidus , Harmozica ravergiensis and Xerolenta obvia . One specimen of T. kusceri was found in a basement of a private estate in Radyvyliv town (Rivne region, Northern Ukraine) in 2020, but it is unknown whether it represents an established colony. Previously unpublished reports of T. kusceri on iNaturalist include two reliable findings from the Caucasian region, in Georgia and Russia, both in 2021. These are the first reports of any Tandonia in Caucasus, as well as in the mentioned countries, with one in Georgia being the eastmost frontier for this genus. In addition to a previously published 2013 report of T. kusceri near Chicago, USA, there are multiple iNaturalist reports of this slug in southern Ontario, Canada (600 km east of Chicago), starting from 2017. Moreover, there are several new reports of T. kusceri in Ukraine, including Kherson, Dnipro, Kryvyi Rig, Marhanets and Kamianets-Podilskyi cities. Considering that most of our new T. kusceri records are from the 2020s, it is most likely that slug has invaded these regions very recently and is still continuing to expand northward and eastward in Europe. This species is expected to further extend its range both in Europe and North America


INTRODUCTION
Invasions by terrestrial molluscs, especially slugs, in new regions outside their natural ranges are often causing significant consequences both to human enterprises and to natural ecosystems (sverlova et al. 2006(sverlova et al. , rowson et al. 2014(sverlova et al. , ZeManova et al. 2017)).Therefore, each new case of extension in the ranges of such organisms requires attention.About 12 species of terrestrial slugs are expanding their ranges in Eastern Europe, with several being extremely important pests (sverlova et al. 2006, son 2010, Balashov & BaIdashnIkov 2012, Balashov 2016, Balashov et al. 2018a, gural-sverlova et al. 2019, turócI et al. 2020, Balashov & Markova 2021).One of these invasive species is Tandonia kusceri (Wagner, 1931) (Milacidae), a large slug (up to 10 cm) originally distributed in the central and northern parts of the Balkan peninsula: in Bulgaria, the European part of Turkey, northern Greece, North Macedonia, southern Serbia and Dobrudzha in eastern Romania (wIktor 1987, 1996, welter-schultes 2012, georgIev & Ivanova 2015, georgIev 2016).At least since 1902 T. kusceri is also present in Odessa region of Ukraine (lIndholM 1908(lIndholM , son 2004(lIndholM , sverlova et al. 2006(lIndholM , gural-sverlova et al. 2019)).It is not completely clear if this was a case of an early invasion or a natural occurrence on the northern border of its indigenous range.In the 1990s and 2000s T. kusceri was shown to expand eastward in Southern Ukraine, to Mykolaiv region and Crimea (kraMarenko & sverlova 2001(kraMarenko & sverlova , son 2004(kraMarenko & sverlova , leonov 2007)).In 2013 T. kusceri was found near Chicago in the USA (gerBer 2014), which was the only published record from outside of Europe until now.Since the 2010s T. kusceri was shown to occur in northeastern Montenegro (teleBak et al. 2013), Moldova (Balashov et al. 2013) In 2021 we found T. kusceri in Kyiv city, very far from its previously published records, and noticed numerous other interesting recent reports by the general public in online databases (iNaturalist, UkrBIN) that are becoming a significant tool for the study of invasive species (larson et al. 2020).Therefore, the goal of our study was to review present distribution of T. kusceri and to examine its new colonies in Kyiv city.
Material was collected, handled and identified using common methods for working with terrestrial slugs (kerney et al. 1983(kerney et al. , rowson et al. 2014(kerney et al. , Balashov 2016) ) and is kept in the Collection of terrestrial molluscs of I. I. Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology (Kyiv, Ukraine).
Identification of the slugs was according to wIktor (1987) with consideration of a recently published study (schallenBerg et al. 2022).Identification was verified by the structure of genitalia (Fig. 3) for both areas in Kyiv with two slugs from each location dissected, as well as for the single slug from Radyvyliv.
For the map (Fig. 4), together with our new findings, we started with the published data (grossu 1983, wIktor 1987, kraMarenko & sverlova 2001, son 2004, leonov 2007, Balashov et al. 2013, teleBak et al. 2013, georgIev & Ivanova 2015, georgIev 2016, 2017, gural-sverlova et al. 2019, Čejka et al. 2020, turócI et al. 2020, Gojšina 2021, duda et al. 2022).The following reports from the online databases iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org)and UkrBIN (www.ukrbin.com)We only used those observations from the online databases where we were able to confirm or make reliable identifications as T. kusceri.Accuracy of coordinates for such observations relies on the faithfulness of the users who uploaded them (many of these users are biologists or experienced amateur naturalists, at least most of them are reliable).The reliability of the most important reports is additionally addressed below.

RESULTS
The two colonies of T. kusceri were sampled in Kyiv city, in Protasiv Yar and Chorna Gora areas, on the distance of 3 km from each other, near the central part of the city.Both sites are along the same branch of a railroad, in Protasiv Yar directly next to a railway bridge and in Chorna Gora in 250 m from the rails.
The first single specimen of T. kusceri in Protasiv Yar was found by us on 25.05.2021.We studied the area again on 26.10.2022 and found 3 more slugs after an intense search at sunset.In Chorna Gora the first 7 slugs were collected on 27.09.2021,several more were observed on 01.05.2022 and over 12 specimens were collected on 22.10.2022.Therefore, on the both sites the colonies of T. kusceri are confirmed to survive for over a year, including wintering in 2021-2022.
In Protasiv Yar slugs were found on a large kerb of footpaths at the edge of the road and in the litter of a narrow strip of vegetation (mostly grass) along these footpaths.Most of the slugs were found directly next to the structures of the bridge.There are numerous small holes among the large structures of concrete and stones, which could be similar to the natural rocky habitats and could provide some refuges for surviving during the cold and dry periods.On the strip of vegetation along the road there are very abundant colonies of the invasive snails Harmozica ravergiensis (Férussac, 1835) and Xerolenta obvia (Menke, 1828).Moreover, several specimens of such molluscs as Cochlicopa lubrica (Müller, 1774), Oxychilus translucidus (Mortillet, 1854) and Deroceras reticulatum (Müller, 1774) were found there.The invasive X. obvia is a Central European species whose natural range is overlapping with that of T. kusceri, while H. ravergiensis and O. translucidus are invasive species of Caucasian origin (Balashov 2016).Harmozica ravergiensis was not reported from Kyiv city before now, but a report from a nearby village was published (Balashov et al. 2018b).In recent years this species was found by us in Kyiv city not only on this site, but rather widely in and around the Protasiv Yar area, including a nearby park.
One specimen of T. kusceri was collected in a basement of a private estate in Radyvyliv town (Rivno region, Northern Ukraine) in the October 2020.This slug was reported to represent a small colony that lives in a basement and was never seen in this estate outside the basement.But we can only confirm a single slug that was sent to us.Several specimens of the invasive slugs Deroceras caucasicum and Krynickillus melanocephalus Kaleniczenko, 1851 were collected in the same area of Radyvyliv town outdoors and were sent to us together with T. kusceri in the same vial.
We have studied the genitalia in the four specimens from Kyiv (Fig. 3) and in one specimen from Radyvyliv.All correspond well to the descriptions of T. kusceri, first of all by the very long epiphallus, which does not occur in the other species of Tandonia (wIktor 1987, Balashov 2016, schallenBerg et al. 2022).
Externally T. kusceri differs from the other Tandonia species by the large size (up to 10 cm), by the small dark spots on the lighter background of the back and especially on the mantle, as well as by the dark bands on the sides of the mantle (Figs 1-2).By these external characters T. kusceri cannot be confused with two other Tandonia species known from Eastern Europe, T. cristata (Kaleniczenko, 1851) and T. kaleniczenkoi (Clessin, 1883), as well as with the widely distributed invasive T. budapestensis (Hazay, 1880).All of these slugs are much smaller and of significantly different colouration (wIktor 1987, Balashov 2016).The only similar species that can be confused with T. kusceri is T. rustica (Millet, 1843).This genetically distinct species is distributed in Western and Central Europe, with the eastmost isolated populations in Czechia, Hungary and central Romania (grossu 1983, wIktor 1987, turócI et al. 2020, schallenBerg et al. 2022).This is partly overlapping with the non-indigenous distribution of T. kusceri (Fig. 4) and is close enough to our present findings to consider T. rustica as a possibility for the similar-looking slugs.But T. rustica is not tending to live in the anthropogenic environment and it appears to be a non-synanthropic species in contrast to T. kusceri.It was even proposed to distinguish T. rustica from T. kusceri by its occurrence in the natural woodland habitats in contrast to the disturbed synanthropic habitats of T. kusceri (schallenBerg et al. 2022).Also, there are not any recent reports about expansion of T. rustica outside its previously known range, especially eastward.Distribution of T. rustica in Czechia, Hungary and Romania, in our opinion, appears to be native (although, it is not completely clear from existing data).Therefore, all recent findings of similar-looking slugs outside native distribution of Tandonia are likely to represent T. kusceri, not T. rustica.We consider it possible to identify the observations of such Tandonia slugs from Eastern Europe, Caucasus and North America in the online databases as probable T. kusceri or T. cf.kusceri.But we have not used for our map (Fig. 4) any photo reports of the similar slugs from Central Europe within known distribution of T. rustica, although there are some notable reports that could represent T. kusceri (e.g., iNaturalist 92488593, 95456860, 136267415).schallenBerg et al. ( 2022 Near Khashuri T. cf.kusceri was observed by a student-biologist from Germany.He has uploaded several more observations from the same locality on the same day and many more from his trip in Georgia.In personal communications it was confirmed that location is correct. In Krasnodar T. cf.kusceri was observed by a local naturalist who has uploaded over 1,200 various observations from this city on iNaturalist.The observation of T. cf.kusceri fits well in the general pattern of these observations.A land snail Helix lucorum Linnaeus, 1758 and a woodlouse Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille, 1804) (Isopoda) were observed on the same day together with T. cf.kusceri.The animals were observed using the iNaturalist Android Application for a smartphone, therefore the coordinates and date were detected and indicated in the database automatically by the device.The accuracy of coordinates was detected as 3 m (within 3 meters from the exact co-Fig.4. Distribution of Tandonia kusceri (except colonies in North America).Shaded area -relatively continuous (native?) distribution; yellow dots -previously published records; red dot -our new findings in Kyiv; orange dot -finding in a basement in Radyvyliv town, Rivno region; purple dots -new reports based on photographs from iNaturalist and UkrBIN ordinates).Coordinates and date detected by the device are present also in the metadata of the uploaded photo.We consider it as a high-quality record with the highest reliability possible for a report from an online database.
Other notable records of T. cf.kusceri on iNaturalist and UkrBIN (Fig. 4) include findings in the several settlements of Ukraine where this species was not reported to occur before now: on the left bank of Dnipro River in Antonivka settlement of Kherson city (Kherson region), in Kazanka settlement (Mykolaiv region), in Marhanets, Kryvyi Rig and Dnipro cities (Dnipro region) and in Kamianets-Podilskyi city (Khmelnytskyi region) (Fig. 4).All of these records apparently represent outdoor colonies in the urban landscapes, but there are no confirmations of wintering and long survival.We have studied each case and consider them reliable, but we will not address their reliability individually here, because the reports are not far from the confirmed non-indigenous distribution of T. kusceri (Fig. 4).
In addition to the finding of T. kusceri in 2013 near Chicago in the USA (gerBer 2014) there are a few iNaturalist reports of T. cf.kusceri from Chicago city in 2018 and 2019, as well as numerous reports from southen Ontario, Canada (600 km east of Chicago), starting from 2017 (see "Material and methods").

DISCUSSION
Present data show a significant expansion of Tandonia kusceri in Europe (Fig. 4) and North America during recent years.Before the 2010s this species was reported to expand from its native range only to the western and central parts of Southern Ukraine (Odessa and Mykolaiv regions, Crimea).All other reports about expansion of T. kusceri, both previously published and presented here, are from the last decade.This is suggestive of very recent processes that are still ongoing.Most of the T. kusceri expansion in Europe is happening in two directions: northward and eastward (Fig. 4).Therefore, this species is mainly expanding to regions with a colder and more continental climate compared to its native range.A similar situation is taking place with many other organisms in Europe during the last decades, including several terrestrial slugs, most notably Arion vulgaris Moquin-Tandon, 1855, Limacus flavus (Linnaeus, 1758), Limacus maculatus, Krynickillus melanocephalus and Deroceras caucasicum that all have invaded Kyiv city recently (sverlova et al. 2006, son 2010, rowson et al. 2014, Balashov 2016, Balashov et al. 2018a, turócI et al. 2020, Balashov & Markova 2021).The first two of these species originated in Southern Europe and are currently expanding northward and eastward, while the other three species are of Caucasian-Crimean origin and are expanding mostly northward and westward.The slug L. flavus started to expand its range much earlier than other mentioned species, but it was associated with basements and other artificial underground habitats, only recently being found to live in the open-air habitats of Kyiv city (Balashov & Markova 2021).Consequently, it appears that T. kusceri is expanding its range mainly in response to global climate changes and is representing the general trends of the "southern" biodiversity moving northward in Europe.Another necessary factor for the successful invasions of T. kusceri is probably globalisation.Observations of T. cf.kusceri on iNaturalist from Chicago city, USA, in 2018 and 2019, are suggesting that after T. kusceri was found near Chicago in 2013 (gerBer 2014) this slug has survived in this area and spread further.Numerous iNaturalist reports of T. cf.kusceri in southen Ontario, Canada, in and around Toronto city (600 km east of Chicago), during 2017-2021, are indicative of a further expansion of this species in North America.Therefore, apparently, T. kusceri has become an established invasive species in North America.
It is not clear whether the expansion of T. kusceri to North America is a result of the climate changes or just an occasion that happened starting from 2010s only because of the globalisation.But considering that slugs has invaded the temperate regions of North America, with a climate that is more comparable to that in the central part of Eastern Europe, rather than in the central Balkans, it appears to be possible that these invasions are also mainly a result of global climate changes, as in Europe.In this case perhaps it means that T. kusceri is a more successful invader in regions where climate has become suitable for it during the recent climate changes, rather than in the regions with climate more comparable to the current climate in the area of its native distribution.
It is notable that in Northern Ukraine T. kusceri is co-occurring with several invasive mollusc species of the Caucasian origin (see above), while the present data (Fig. 4) are showing that it has also invaded the area of their native distribution in the Caucasian region.It is indicative of a possibility for the Balkan and Caucasian species not only to invade northward into the regions with colder climate, but also for an exchange of biodiversity between these regions.
The mechanisms of the T. kusceri invasions are not clear.Most terrestrial slugs are transported accidentally among plants, especially horticultural cargos (Bergey et al. 2014).But association of the T. kusceri colonies in Kyiv with a railroad and with rocks may suggest that perhaps in some cases this slug is invading with building materials or on train carriages.Such mechanisms exist for several xerophilous land snails, in Eastern Europe most notably Xeropicta derbentina (Krynicki, 1836) and Xerolenta obvia (gural-sverlova & gural 2017(gural-sverlova & gural , Balashov et al. 2018c(gural-sverlova & gural , gural-sverlova et al. 2022)).The latter species occurs with T. kusceri near a railway bridge in the Protasiv Yar area.Tandonia kusceri is a relatively xerophilous slug that tend to live in the open and rather dry habitats, so perhaps it could survive such transportation in some cases.
As far as we know there are no reports about the economic importance of T. kusceri.Therefore, it appears not to be a significant pest, but this topic requires additional studies.
In summary, T. kusceri has spread rapidly in the last decade and is expected to extend its range greatly in the near future, even more so with further climate changes.In Europe this species is spreading mostly northward and eastward from its native range in the Balkans and should be expected to become widespread in Ukraine, Romania, Moldova and south-western Russia, as well as to invade Czechia and Poland, probably also Belarus, Baltic countries and elsewhere, as it has already happened with some other invasive slugs.In North America T. kusceri appears to be becoming an established species in Illinois and southern Ontario and, therefore, should be expected to spread further at least in the northern USA and southern Canada.From a species of local importance T. kusceri is very quickly becoming a widely distributed invader.